hofprints

Protoapennine vs. Subapennine: Mathematical Distinction Between Two Ceramic Phases

Lukesh, Susan and Howe, Sally (1978) Protoapennine vs. Subapennine: Mathematical Distinction Between Two Ceramic Phases. Journal of Field Archaeology, 5 (3). pp. 339-347.

Full text available as:

PDF - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
550 Kb

Abstract

The excavation of the early Bronze Age village of Tufariello, Buccino, in Italy, forced the recognition of a problem crucial to the understanding of the Bronze Age sequences in the Italian peninsula. At this site, fine ceramic ware exactly fit the description of such ware known from Subapennine, Late Bronze Age sites. The Tufariello site, however, is firmly set in an Early Bronze Age, Protopennine tradition, thus demonstrating convincingly that the beginning and final moments of the Apennine ceramic tradition may visually be identical. Since the validity of both phases has been established, it is imperative to develop a means of identifying the respective ceramics. That they must in some manner differ is suggested by the time span separating their manufacture (perhaps as long as 800 years), and a differentiation based on mathematical analysis of their primary measurements is discussed here.

Item Type:Article
Uncontrolled Keywords:Protoapennine, Subapennine, Mathematical Distinction, Ceramic Phases, ceramics, italian,
Subjects:C Auxiliary Sciences of History > CC Archaeology
D History General and Old World > D History (General) > D051 Ancient History
N Fine Arts > NB Sculpture
N Fine Arts > NX Arts in general
D History General and Old World > D History (General)
ID Code:50
Deposited By:Admin HofPrints
Deposited On:10 April 2006

Repository Staff Only: edit this item